Why Facebook Should Never Surprise Marketers

/, Social Media Marketing/Why Facebook Should Never Surprise Marketers

We’ve been operating and specializing in content marketing for over nine years at Bonfire. Like countless other industries, the one thing that‘s always constant is change. Earlier this month, Facebook announced a change in their algorithm that, for some, made it seem like the sky was falling. Whether hyperbolic or real, the change will dramatically impact those that are unprepared.

We’ve been here before. Facebook has updated its algorithm several times over the last eight years, as have most other online networks. Changes like this shouldn’t come as a surprise if we get over our self-righteousness and understand that all online service businesses are not marketing’s friend. Hopefully, this post can shed some light on why online companies punish publishers and marketers and what we can do stay ahead of the changes.

The birth of an internet company

When a company like Facebook starts, all they want is for people to use their service. Their primary metric is Daily Active Users (DAU), which is a decent leading indicator of how sticky their product is. They invite publishers and marketers to build great content on their channel because their content is familiar to the audience. Facebook had this effect immediately by using friend connections as a basis for familiar stories, but opened it up to publishers and marketers when the social graph’s intrigue started to run dry. (There’s only so much your friend group can post to keep you interested, no matter how much much Facebook wanted you to check.)

In the beginning, publishers and marketers could reach their audience because the algorithms allowed them to. Most of our clients were getting 30 percent viewership to their page audience. Facebook told page owners to recruit “likes” (at the time called “fans”) and rewarded them with higher viewership. (More fans = higher algorithmic relevance, aka the popularity contest rule.) We also saw that the higher the like count, the bigger the reach and cheaper the advertisement. It all was pretty simple, but things changed quickly.

Facebook started to adjust its algorithm to punish those that:

  • Published content that was bad or irrelevant
  • Published too often and annoyed the audience.

They introduced new ad units to help publishers reach the same amount of people with a highly targeted ad engine. Publishers and marketers remained happy. Advertisements were still effective, but all the work and budget going into content development started to see diminishing returns.

Then the gaming began. People learned how the algorithm worked (affinity, weight, and time decay) and started to game the system. Less ethical characters started to publish misleading and divisive content (fake news), and audiences lost trust in the network. The question now: Why didn’t Facebook change the algorithm earlier? Mark Zuckerberg fundamentally believes in the wisdom of crowds. He believes democratization of communication brings the best and most honest message to the surface. I’m not here to argue the merits of his belief, but I assume he’s had that belief challenged over the last year.

The maturity of an internet company

Most online companies are reaching a mature inflection point. They are skillful in providing a platform for communication and discovery. They moderate content for validity and monetize well through advertising. They have a majority of all internet users engaging with them on a daily basis. They have the audience (users) exactly where they want them. Internet companies at this stage don’t need publishers. They have the audience, so now it’s time to squeeze publishers for access. To put this in perspective, NBC, CBS, and ABC don’t allow advertisers free access, so why should Facebook, Google, or Twitter? Let’s take a look at what some platforms have done in the last 24 months.

Google

The internet search giant worked hard to reduce the amount of available advertising space, as well as making ads indistinguishable to search results. This resulted in higher advertisement click-throughs and a reduction in SEO viability. The same goes for YouTube but to a lesser extent.

The internet search giant worked hard to reduce the amount of available advertising space, as well as making ads indistinguishable to search results.

Facebook

Publishers and marketers have felt like a frog on a hot plate with diminishing returns, but given their audience and advertising targeting, Facebook has been hard to avoid. Although there is little recent data of the overall reach of organic posts by pages, the trendline from 2015 is clear.

Publishers and marketers have felt like a frog on a hot plate with diminishing returns, but given their audience and advertising targeting, Facebook has been hard to avoid.

Publishers and marketers have felt like a frog on a hot plate with diminishing returns, but given their audience and advertising targeting, Facebook has been hard to avoid.

The most important way to survive an algorithmic adjustment and thrive is to realize they are inevitable.

What do we do now?

The most important way to survive an algorithmic adjustment and thrive is to realize they are inevitable. Embrace the fact that internet channels are businesses that need to make money. They care about Daily Active Users (DAUs) not about organic access to publishers and marketers. As publishers and marketers, we must be on these channels, and there are a few ways to achieve success.

  1. Make great content that people want to see: This might seem obvious, but most marketers and publishers don’t consider it when creating content. Marketers are more interested in getting their message out rather than creating content that provides audience value and positive positioning for their brand. Social channels are for attracting an audience and for discovery. Rarely should it be used for direct conversions.
  2. Be an advertising expert: As a marketer or publisher, you have to sharpen your advertising skills. We rarely recommend placing advertising spend behind every piece of content, but all content should be considered advertisable. Creating a ratio of content to advertising campaigns and building content around a calendar for audience relevance will improve your interactions, your reach, and — most importantly — reduce the cost per click (CPC) or cost per thousand (CPM) views. Facebook and Google both score advertisement effectiveness and reward good ads with lower rates.
  3. Make sure to capture information: No third party network can take your email database. It’s an asset and audience insurance policy to third party adjustments. If you haven’t been collecting content information, retargeting, email nurturing, and measuring customer value, now is the time. With email and website traffic, you are creating your very own audience to optimize and utilize, one that’s relatively immune to third-party algorithm adjustments.
  4. Diversify your delivery methods: If you’ve been collecting data, now might be the time to branch out and diversify your channels. Explore ABM, retargeting, and email nurturing. Track database behavior and create segmented campaigns based on stage and demographic. Consider only using social networks and search engine marketing sparingly for brand alignment and new market recruitment.

Today is a new day. Build with purpose, boost with precision, capture and measure everything, and diversify strategically.

Further reading:

The Ultimate Social Media Best Practices 2017 [Infographic]

Upcoming Trends in ROI for 2018

By | 2018-02-13T04:58:08+00:00 January 24th, 2018|Categories: Blog, Social Media Marketing|Tags: , , |

About the Author:

Ryan Lewis
Ryan Lewis is the founder and president of Bonfire Marketing. His mission to bring scale, measurement and exponential effectiveness to digital marketing drives him to integrate traditional and innovative ideas for campaigns. A Northwest native, Ryan enjoys spending time with his wife and two young children outside as much as possible.

Leave A Comment